Emerson Law Group is a law firm with a tradition of providing clients with the highest quality legal services in a cost efficient and timely manner. With over twenty-five years of combined litigation experience, Emerson Law Group has respected expertise in business, insurance defense and construction defect litigation. Phillip R. Emerson and the firm's experienced associates possess diverse talents, broad experience and expertise in many civil matters.
These diverse talents enhance the firm's competence to handle a wide variety of matters including litigation prevention advice, alternative dispute resolution, coverage opinions and appellate litigation. We understand the needs of our clients and represent their interests throughout the state of Nevada.
These diverse talents enhance the firm's competence to handle a wide variety of matters including litigation prevention advice, alternative dispute resolution, coverage opinions and appellate litigation. We understand the needs of our clients and represent their interests throughout the state of Nevada.
Services
Unlike the "billing mill" mentality and multiple associates approach to working on each file in larger law firms, we have chosen to separate ourselves from the large "cog in the wheel" multi-state, multi-associate firms to devote individual time and attention to our clients.
Our clients enjoy a single point of contact with the firm regarding their legal matters; that is, their legal matters are not shuffled from one associate to another.
Emerson Law Group's ultimate goal is the commitment to excellence and the client's complete satisfaction.
Our clients enjoy a single point of contact with the firm regarding their legal matters; that is, their legal matters are not shuffled from one associate to another.
Emerson Law Group's ultimate goal is the commitment to excellence and the client's complete satisfaction.
We have achieved our distinct high rating through peer review from fellow attorneys and honorable Judges.
We do not believe in or rely on purchased firm ratings.
Of the 82 Jury Trials, 6 settled prior to Jury verdict.
He prevailed on 69 out of 76 Trials that went to verdict (90% win ratio).
Our attorneys have extensive experience practicing in multiple venues throughout Nevada, including State and Federal Courts, whether it involves Alternative Dispute Resolution or Trial.
Arbitration, Mediation and other forms of Dispute Resolution are always encouraged and used when appropriate.
We do not believe in or rely on purchased firm ratings.
Of the 82 Jury Trials, 6 settled prior to Jury verdict.
He prevailed on 69 out of 76 Trials that went to verdict (90% win ratio).
Our attorneys have extensive experience practicing in multiple venues throughout Nevada, including State and Federal Courts, whether it involves Alternative Dispute Resolution or Trial.
Arbitration, Mediation and other forms of Dispute Resolution are always encouraged and used when appropriate.
A major focus at Emerson Law Group is our insurance defense practice.
Our firm works with major insurance companies across the nation to investigate and defend claims brought against their insureds.
Over the years, our attorneys have developed the skills needed to fully evaluate these claims, including risk analysis, while also ensuring minimal litigation costs.
Our Trial history confirms our ability to aggressively litigate these claims and our vast experience in alternative dispute resolution helps us to achieve a swift resolution in cases appropriately suited for same.
Our firm works with major insurance companies across the nation to investigate and defend claims brought against their insureds.
Over the years, our attorneys have developed the skills needed to fully evaluate these claims, including risk analysis, while also ensuring minimal litigation costs.
Our Trial history confirms our ability to aggressively litigate these claims and our vast experience in alternative dispute resolution helps us to achieve a swift resolution in cases appropriately suited for same.
Defendant denied liability.
Plaintiff claimed multiple significant bodily injuries including neck and low back disc injuries and left shoulder injuries requiring two shoulder surgeries.
Plaintiff's pre-trial demand: $1.5 million - Defendant's pre-trial offer: $25,000.
During closing Plaintiff asked jury for $664,784.
Defendant admitted liability, but argued causation.
Plaintiff claimed significant low back injury and underwent a subsequent L3-4 laminectomy and L5-S1 lumbar fusion with a required future L4-5 lumbar fusion.
Plaintiff claimed multiple significant bodily injuries including neck and low back disc injuries and left shoulder injuries requiring two shoulder surgeries.
Plaintiff's pre-trial demand: $1.5 million - Defendant's pre-trial offer: $25,000.
During closing Plaintiff asked jury for $664,784.
Defendant admitted liability, but argued causation.
Plaintiff claimed significant low back injury and underwent a subsequent L3-4 laminectomy and L5-S1 lumbar fusion with a required future L4-5 lumbar fusion.
Reviews
Be the first to review Emerson & Manke.
Write a Review
