Karsten & Tallberg
Call now
Call now
Website
Call
Our firm is dedicated to litigation and trial practice in state and federal court. We also represent parties before administrative agencies, on appeal and in negotiated resolutions. With a rare level of trial experience, we approach every case as if it will be brought to verdict before a jury. Our practice is focused on the defense of public entities and officials, law enforcement liability, employment practices liability, and business litigation.

We are especially dedicated to representing our clients' interests at trial, yet we are also skilled in the art of negotiation. We are panel counsel for a number of insurers and claim professionals throughout the country. We have represented most of the self-insured municipalities in Connecticut. Our clients have also included large corporations, small businesses, associations, non-profits, and individuals.

Muschette on Behalf of A.M. v. Gionfriddo, 910 F.3d 65 2d Cir. 2018) (reversing district court and finding that officer did not act objectively unreasonable in deploying his Taser against deaf 12 year old from behind after issuing warnings about Taser).
Services
We represent public entities and officials against all types of civil claims, in state and federal court and before administrative agencies.
Our attorneys have represented a majority of the 169 municipalities in the state of Connecticut.
Most of our clients are towns, cities, public officials, police officers, school boards, teachers, and other public sector employees.
We defend every variety of civil claim faced by Connecticut public entities and officials, including professional and general liability claims.
In addition, there are numerous decisions that are not reported but encompass the areas of our expertise, available upon request.
2018) (reversing district court and finding that officer did not act objectively unreasonable in deploying his Taser against deaf 12 year old from behind after issuing warnings about Taser).
2018) (affirming summary judgment in favor of defendant officer on plaintiff's § 1983 malicious prosecution claim because there was probable cause for the crime charged).
2018) (affirming summary judgment in favor of employer on plaintiff's Title VII failure to promote race discrimination claim).
Reviews
Review Karsten & Tallberg

Be the first to review Karsten & Tallberg.

Write a Review