The law levels the playing field. It is a place where one can obtain justice and compensation when they have suffered harm, loss, or injustice because of the negligent or wrongful actions of another. A lone individual can prevail against a huge company; a defrauded buyer can prevail against a devious seller; an injured person can get compensation against the person who injured her.
All of this is possible in our courts of law. We will only file meritorious lawsuits, and we encourage alternative resolutions wherever possible. While many cases settle before trial, not all do. It is vitally important that the injured party have an attorney who is ready, willing, and able to go to trial if the other side will not agree to a fair settlement.
That is what we do. Larry Reilly's verdict in Kinard v. Arnow Construction Company et al. was featured in the Connecticut Law Tribune's list of the top 20 personal injury verdicts in 2011. In the Kinard case, the plaintiff's car was struck from behind by a pick-up truck owned and driven by the defendants.
All of this is possible in our courts of law. We will only file meritorious lawsuits, and we encourage alternative resolutions wherever possible. While many cases settle before trial, not all do. It is vitally important that the injured party have an attorney who is ready, willing, and able to go to trial if the other side will not agree to a fair settlement.
That is what we do. Larry Reilly's verdict in Kinard v. Arnow Construction Company et al. was featured in the Connecticut Law Tribune's list of the top 20 personal injury verdicts in 2011. In the Kinard case, the plaintiff's car was struck from behind by a pick-up truck owned and driven by the defendants.
Services
This case involved a claim against a home improvement contractor who was hired to renovate a majestic old home.
The project ran seriously over budget and time when the relationship between the homeowner and contractor finally disintegrated.
Inspections revealed that several elements of the construction were defective.
The case involved claims of medical malpractice in connection with a surgery.
We were able to prove that the surgeon was not properly prepared for the surgery, that the surgery was attempted improperly, and that the surgeon did not properly follow the patient after the surgery.
The project ran seriously over budget and time when the relationship between the homeowner and contractor finally disintegrated.
Inspections revealed that several elements of the construction were defective.
The case involved claims of medical malpractice in connection with a surgery.
We were able to prove that the surgeon was not properly prepared for the surgery, that the surgery was attempted improperly, and that the surgeon did not properly follow the patient after the surgery.
Reviews
Be the first to review The Reilly Law Firm.
Write a Review
